UNA, best software platform... criticism
It's very cool 
when I browsing a users profile UNA to see many links in the user profile where she always writes the same thing: "EMPTY"
Was this problem already solved in Dolphin at some point? Where were menu and html blocks without content is invisible? I wonder why the same mistakes in the UNA script that are supposed to be superior to Dolphin should always be repeated?
Or is it a new strategy to fool the search engines that I did not know and prove that the site has more content and more pages.
I'm curious to find out what it is useful to see many pages with EMTY content.
Is there a smart boy who can illuminate me?
Is UNA the same Dolphin that starts from 0 with another name and another interface or is it an evolution of the Dolphin script?
I feel in the fog,
I morally support development and refuse to follow the same paths of the past.
Have nice day developers
-
Are you referring to this?
How it says "Empty" on the post?
I've also noticed that too and think it should just not show the word "Empty" if there's nothing there. -
it is about the contents of the user menu pages
-
This problem has been solved in dolphin at a time when menus with pages with no content or page_blocks with no content were invisible, is now repeated in UNA
-
Or empty page_Blocks on the other pages
-
You can change it from "empty" to anything you'd like using the Polyglot module.
-
But this is not a solution, we will have thousands of pages with the same content, they should be invisible
-
-
In drupal, the most advanced CMS, there is a module called vievs.
For example, there can be categories that can be generated in the taxonomy.
These categories can be used to generate menus, which contain pages, or pages can be generated that are attached to a node.
For example, a profile can have a menu called blog, if that user does not have any blog, then the visitor does not make sense to see that menu that opens a page devoid of content in which it is written that that user does not have any blog.
A site can have many apps, dozens or even more. It seems senseless to me to attach a menu to a profile that opens a page with no content. If that user does not create content in that application: blog, photos or something else, those pages and the menus to them must be invisible, or the empty page block in the page.
There must be a condition, if there is no content not to display anything. Neither page nor empty blocks.
Each user has his preferences to use one water or another. If the site has 30 apps, what sense does it make to display 30 menus that lead to empty pages on the user's profile page that has no content or public content in that app?
After so many years of development, the boonex team must also have a little practical sense, to provide clients with a script capable of displaying real content on a screen. Especially in this era of speed and small phone screens. I don't see the point of browsing some links without content. I think Google SEO has a robot there that penalizes sites with pages without content.
And BOONEX or UNA as you want to call yourself generates millions of useless pages on the internet, by providing this script that wastes people's time and electricity and other resources on servers to dispaly emty page.
5 years have passed but nothing has been done to improve the user experience in this regard.
Each menu from each user must be activated or deactivated depending on the condition if it has content or not, also html blocks. When a user adds content to the respective app, the pages menu is automatically activated together with the html block in which the content is displayed. Also depending on the permissions the user has to view that menu or page or page block or content, become visible or not.
-