Cover Photos
Don't get me wrong I get the concept of cover photos on pages, but really enabled on every page?
I found that the pages across my website LGBTQIA+ Community look a lot better when the cover photo is disabled. So I just spent the last 30 minutes disabling the cover on all my pages apart from the following as the member has the ability to change them.
- Profiles
- Groups
- Organization Profiles
I know you can set a default cover and that is great but you don't want to see the same cover everywhere and unless you go to every page designing a cover for the pages they are a bit redundant.
I think cover photos should be disabled by default apart from
- Homepage - Set to Vistors Only!
- Profiles
- Organization Profile
- Groups
Administrators have the option to enable the cover where they want to instead of having to manually disable them all.
Just a thought. 😁
-
- · Will Roberts
- ·
I did the same. I disabled as many covers as I could and still find some pages with covers on them.
-
- · Friendshare
- ·
It definitely seems like there's some missed opportunity with 'site wide' applications to theming like this. I agree that there are some pages that I might want to have a cover, but generally, I don't.
-
- · Molosser Dogs
- ·
Maybe a coder like Jerome Mingo AQB Soft or MSolutions could write a script to scrub the db and turn off all covers or all except profile, groups and orgs.
UNA This would be a good thing to add to the Developer tool.... :)