with local storage on, Storing to AWS and digitalocean S3 :)
Important warning:
riofs is buggy and very dangerous dont use it at all.
Alex Baloo Leonid Andrew,
Hi guys,
I was in trouble with the AWS S3 service.
After the fix with Alex, it was mixed again and never worked in any combination.
I started reading (like my patients do from google :))) ), discovered that there are more s3 services like digitalocean. (and its cost is even less then AWS.)
I checked the AWS plugin file of UNA It was configured for aws end point. I changed it to digitalocean`s .
But no it didnt work same error like AWS.
Then I thought to save UNA from object storage coding and endless AWS rule systems :)
In a fresh install, left it as local storing.
In the fresh install the storage folder was empty.
Installed s3fs and mounted the digitalocean "space" to the local "una/storage" folder.
tried to create an album and send photos and VOILA!!! the folders and file was created in digital oceans space...
I can add, delete the pictures like local.
Only it is seen a little bit latency during the upload. Possibly due to the server connection/location and digitalocean space location.
this method may solve the difficulties to migrate to S3 services.
What are your opinions?
Note:
After some trials with S3fs I found an alternative riofs.
Riofs works 10-20 times faster then s3fs.
-
- · Baloo
- ·
-
- · Cem
-
·
In reply to Baloo
- ·
Now I installed both una server and space to the same region of digitalocean and it works like local, very fast :)
I am just learning /remembering things, I didnt heart about hubic yet :) I will check it.
advantages of this configuration will be,- very good price for storage
- ability to move the local installation to object based storage servers with local block system.
copying to the mounted folder may do the trick for the migration.
I will make trials and write a how to and if UNA team approves we may publish here.
We have to think about the future consequences of such structure.